Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: Frequency lock should be consideredin hibernation also.

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Nov 25 2013 - 09:16:51 EST


On 25 November 2013 19:08, Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Frequency lock value should be higher or same than the booting frequency,
> which is set by the bootloader. To eliminate possible inconsistency
> in frequency, we save and restore frequency during suspend & resume
> and disable CPUFREQ activity. This should be considered in hibernation also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Hi,

Can you please test this patchset:

[PATCH V3 0/6] cpufreq: suspend early/resume late

Then, we wouldn't require the routine you modified and hence
your patchset :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/