Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: allow to set overcommit ratio more precisely

From: Jerome Marchand
Date: Wed Nov 06 2013 - 03:43:00 EST




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Jerome Marchand" <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "dave hansen" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 12:53:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: allow to set overcommit ratio more precisely
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:56:59 +0200 Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Some applications that run on HPC clusters are designed around the
> > availability of RAM and the overcommit ratio is fine tuned to get the
> > maximum usage of memory without swapping. With growing memory, the 1%
> > of all RAM grain provided by overcommit_ratio has become too coarse
> > for these workload (on a 2TB machine it represents no less than
> > 20GB).
> >
> > This patch adds the new overcommit_ratio_ppm sysctl variable that
> > allow to set overcommit ratio with a part per million precision.
> > The old overcommit_ratio variable can still be used to set and read
> > the ratio with a 1% precision. That way, overcommit_ratio interface
> > isn't broken in any way that I can imagine.
>
> The way we've permanently squished this mistake in the past is to
> switch to "bytes". See /proc/sys/vm/*bytes.
>
> Would that approach work in this case?
>

That was my first version of this patch (actually "kbytes" to avoid
overflow).
Dave raised the issue that it silently breaks the user interface:
overcommit_ratio is zero while the system behaves differently.

Jerome
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/