[PATCH 3.10 15/54] net: secure_seq: Fix warning when CONFIG_IPV6 and CONFIG_INET are not selected

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Nov 01 2013 - 18:35:41 EST


3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit cb03db9d0e964568407fb08ea46cc2b6b7f67587 ]

net_secret() is only used when CONFIG_IPV6 or CONFIG_INET are selected.

Building a defconfig with both of these symbols unselected (Using the ARM
at91sam9rl_defconfig, for example) leads to the following build warning:

$ make at91sam9rl_defconfig
#
# configuration written to .config
#

$ make net/core/secure_seq.o
scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
CHK include/config/kernel.release
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.h' is up to date.
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC net/core/secure_seq.o
net/core/secure_seq.c:17:13: warning: 'net_secret_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

Fix this warning by protecting the definition of net_secret() with these
symbols.

Reported-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/secure_seq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/net/core/secure_seq.c
+++ b/net/core/secure_seq.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@

#include <net/secure_seq.h>

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
#define NET_SECRET_SIZE (MD5_MESSAGE_BYTES / 4)

static u32 net_secret[NET_SECRET_SIZE] ____cacheline_aligned;
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ static void net_secret_init(void)
cmpxchg(&net_secret[--i], 0, tmp);
}
}
+#endif

#ifdef CONFIG_INET
static u32 seq_scale(u32 seq)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/