Re: [PATCH 2/5] mfd: tc3589x: detect the precise version

From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Oct 16 2013 - 05:23:20 EST


On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

> Instead of detecting the "tc3589x" and hard-coding the number of
> GPIO pins to 24, encode all the possible subtypes and set the
> number of GPIO pins from the type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c b/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c
> index 70f4909f..0eabbb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tc3589x.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,19 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/tc3589x.h>
>
> +/**
> + * enum tc3589x_version - indicates the TC3589x version
> + */
> +enum tc3589x_version {
> + TC3589X_TC35890,
> + TC3589X_TC35892,
> + TC3589X_TC35893,
> + TC3589X_TC35894,
> + TC3589X_TC35895,
> + TC3589X_TC35896,
> + TC3589X_UNKNOWN,
> +};
> +
> #define TC3589x_CLKMODE_MODCTL_SLEEP 0x0
> #define TC3589x_CLKMODE_MODCTL_OPERATION (1 << 0)
>
> @@ -361,7 +374,33 @@ static int tc3589x_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> tc3589x->i2c = i2c;
> tc3589x->pdata = pdata;
> tc3589x->irq_base = pdata->irq_base;
> - tc3589x->num_gpio = id->driver_data;
> +
> + switch (id->driver_data) {
> + case TC3589X_TC35890:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 24;
> + break;
> + case TC3589X_TC35892:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 24;
> + break;
> + case TC3589X_TC35893:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 20;
> + break;
> + case TC3589X_TC35894:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 24;
> + break;
> + case TC3589X_TC35895:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 20;
> + break;
> + case TC3589X_TC35896:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 20;
> + break;
> + case TC3589X_UNKNOWN:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 24;
> + break;
> + default:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 24;
> + break;
> + }
>
> i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, tc3589x);
>
> @@ -432,7 +471,13 @@ static int tc3589x_resume(struct device *dev)
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tc3589x_dev_pm_ops, tc3589x_suspend, tc3589x_resume);
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id tc3589x_id[] = {
> - { "tc3589x", 24 },
> + { "tc35890", TC3589X_TC35890 },
> + { "tc35892", TC3589X_TC35892 },
> + { "tc35893", TC3589X_TC35893 },
> + { "tc35894", TC3589X_TC35894 },
> + { "tc35895", TC3589X_TC35895 },
> + { "tc35896", TC3589X_TC35896 },
> + { "tc3589x", TC3589X_UNKNOWN },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tc3589x_id);

This is an awful lot of code for what we're trying to achieve. I
propose two alternitives:

1. I guess that other OSes will need to capture the same
information, so wouldn't it be prudant to do so via a DT property?
That way it's just a one or two liner.

Or:

2. As we're only using .driver_data for num_gpio at this time, just
place them in tc3589x_id as you have done for tc3589x.

Or, my least favourate alternitive, but still an improvment with
regards to saving code:

3. Again, as all of this extra code is only used for pulling out
num_gpio, group the devices by num_gpio:

> + switch (id->driver_data) {
> + case TC3589X_TC35893:
> + case TC3589X_TC35895:
> + case TC3589X_TC35896:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 20;
> + break;
> + case TC3589X_TC35890:
> + case TC3589X_TC35892:
> + case TC3589X_TC35894:
> + case TC3589X_UNKNOWN:
> + default:
> + tc3589x->num_gpio = 24;
> + break;
> + }

My personal preference is 1 and 2 in equal measure.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/