Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Avoid select_idle_sibling() for wake_affine(.sync=true)

[Michael wang]

On 09/26/2013 11:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:09:46PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
>>> +	if (sync)
>>> +		p->se.last_sync_wakeup = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
>>
>> Forgive me but I'm trying to understand it... why not 'current' but 'p'
>> here? we want the get off speed of waker or the working time of wakee?
> 
> Because I'm an idiot? ;-)

Well, I know you are full of good ideas ;-)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/