Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: Tell about irq stack coverage

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:08:20 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > +# define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > Ok, see the previous email, this should just be a single
> > 
> >     select IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK
> > 
> > in under the "config X86_64" header in arch/x86/Kconfig.
> > 
> > And as of right now, this patch series should do it for Power too,
> > since I just merged Ben's branch, which contained commit 0366a1c70b89
> > ("powerpc/irq: Run softirqs off the top of the irq stack"). Again,
> > just a single select in the arch/powerpc/Kconfig gile should be
> > sufficient.
> > 
> 
> This happens quite a lot.  Perhaps Joe can cook us up a checkpatch
> rule.  "#define [__]ARCH_HA" looks like a decent search pattern.  
> 

Huh?  That matches all the ARCH_HAS_<foo> patterns.

What is it you want again?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/