[PATCH] Cpufreq: Acquire read lock in the cpufreq_policy_restore() rather than write lock

From: tianyu . lan
Date: Wed Sep 11 2013 - 03:14:43 EST


From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>

In the cpufreq_policy_restore(), policy before system suspend is read from
from percpu's cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback. It's read operation rather than
write operation. So convert write lock to read lock

Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 81ceea6..b762f9b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -912,11 +912,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned long flags;

- write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);

policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu);

- write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);

return policy;
}
--
1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/