Re: ACPI vs Device Tree - moving forward

[Matthew Garrett]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:55:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Question is: Does this work _today_ with any existing driver, where
> one interrupt is served through ACPI and another as 'standard' Linux
> interrupt ? If yes, it must be working, and using fdt to describe
> the interrupt mapping for the non-ACPI interrupt should not make
> a difference. If no, the problem does not really have anything
> to do with fdt.

There's no such thing as an ACPI interrupt, it's just a data source in 
the same way that PnP used to be. _CRS refers to platform interrupts.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/