Re: [E1000-devel] 3.11-rc4 ixgbevf: endless "Last Request of type 00to PF Nacked" messages

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:25:06PM +0000, Skidmore, Donald C wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 9:53 AM
> > To: Skidmore, Donald C
> > Cc: e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Don Dutile
> > Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 3.11-rc4 ixgbevf: endless "Last Request of type 00
> > to PF Nacked" messages
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >>> I played with this a little more and found this:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1) Magma card in z420, connected to chassis containing X540: fails
> > >>> (original report)
> > >>> 2) X540 in z420, Magma card in z420, connected to empty chassis:
> > >>> fails
> > >>> 3) X540 in z420, Magma card in z420 but no cable to chassis: works
> > >
> > > For what it's worth, I tried config 3 again with v3.11-rc6, and it
> > > failed the same way.  I haven't bothered with config 2.  It's not 100%
> > > reproducible, but at least it doesn't seem related to the expansion
> > > chassis.
> > >
> > > I attached the logs from config 3 to
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60776
> > 
> > Is there anything I can do to help debug this?  Add instrumentation, etc.?  It
> > seems like I'm doing the simplest possible thing -- just writing to the sysfs
> > sriov_num_vfs file to enable VFs.
> > 
> > I almost think it must be related to my config somehow if nobody else is
> > seeing this, but at the same time, my config also seems the simplest possible,
> > so I don't know what I could be doing that's unusual.
> > 
> > Bjorn
> 
> Hey Bjorn,
> 
> I'm may be little confused so bear with me.
> 
> Option 1 = (your normal set up), Magma card plugged to chasis, X540 in chasis.
> Option 2 = Magma card plugged to chasis, X540 in z420 system.
> Option 3 = Magma card UNplugged from chasis, x540 in z420 system.
> 
> Options 1 & 2 - always fail
> Option 3 - sometimes fails (unsure at what rate failure occurs)
> 
> Please correct me if I messed any of that up. :)

Generally correct.  I've seen failures in all three configs, so I'm only
concerned with the simplest for now (config 3, no expansion chassis).

> Another question I have relates to the lspci output you supplied in the bugzilla.  I'm not seeing the VF devices (i.e. 08:10.0) did you run lspci before you created the VF's?  If so could we see one while the failure was occurring?

That's correct, I collected the lspci output before reproducing the
problem.  I can't easily collect lspci afterwards because the machine isn't
responsive after the problem starts.

> Also could you download the latest ixgbevf from source forge?
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/ixgbevf%20stable/
> 
> If we add debugging messages it will be easier to patch this driver and it contains our latest validated code base.

I can do that if it turns out to be necessary.  But John Haller gave me a
good clue off-list: 

John wrote:
> I assume you want the VFs to be instantiated in a VM.  To do this,
> you need to blacklist the ixgbevf driver in the host (or not
> compile it into the host), or it will try to associate the driver
> in the host, rather than in the VM where you want it.  Then, the
> VM needs the ixgbevf driver, which will hopefully do a better job
> of talking to the mailbox in the host.  There is some work to
> assign the VF(s) to the VM, but I don't remember that offhand.

I don't have any VMs (I started this whole thing because I was
looking at a PCI hotplug issue related to SR-IOV, so I don't really
care about VMs).

So the ixgbevf driver on the *host* is claiming the new VFs, and it
sounds like maybe it can't handle that?

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/