Re: [PATCH 1/8] um: Create defconfigs for i386 and x86_64

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Richard,

On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:19:25 +0200 Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Instead of having one defconfig for both i386 and x86_64
> we have now two.
> This is the first step to get rid of SUBARCH.
> 
> This patch is based on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/4/396
> 
> Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig   | 954 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 943 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 1897 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig
>  create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig

Can these still work if put through "make savedefconfig" like other
architectures defconfig files?  I did a test and they produce files that
are only 74-75 lines long and the resulting files produced the
same .config when used in place of their originals.  But I only did that
test on an X86_64 host, so I just don't know if there is some strangeness
of um that would stop us using them.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature