Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] mm, hugetlb: fix subpool accounting handling

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> writes:

> If we alloc hugepage with avoid_reserve, we don't dequeue reserved one.
> So, we should check subpool counter when avoid_reserve.
> This patch implement it.

Can you explain this better ? ie, if we don't have a reservation in the
area chg != 0. So why look at avoid_reserve. 

Also the code will become if you did

if (!chg && avoid_reserve)
   chg = 1;

and then rest of the code will be able to handle the case.

>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 12b6581..ea1ae0a 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1144,13 +1144,14 @@ static struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	chg = vma_needs_reservation(h, vma, addr);
>  	if (chg < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -	if (chg)
> -		if (hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, chg))
> +	if (chg || avoid_reserve)
> +		if (hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, 1))
>  			return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
>
>  	ret = hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(idx, pages_per_huge_page(h), &h_cg);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, chg);
> +		if (chg || avoid_reserve)
> +			hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
>  	}
>  	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> @@ -1162,7 +1163,8 @@ static struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(idx,
>  						       pages_per_huge_page(h),
>  						       h_cg);
> -			hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, chg);
> +			if (chg || avoid_reserve)
> +				hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
>  			return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
>  		}
>  		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/