Re: [PATCH] x86, mm: Avoid step_size overflow and add comments

[Ingo Molnar]

* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Current code

"Current code has two problems:"

> 1. shift step_size directly, and this could have overflow problem
>    after we shift step_size several times.

The most important piece of information is not explained: 
under what circumstances can this happen currently, what 
are the symptoms if this happens, roughly what kind of 
systems are affected, etc?

I mean the kind of information you'd put into a BIOS errata 
description or into any software changelog. You wouldn't 
primarily write about the mechanics of the change, but 
about the _actual impact_ of the change, to end users, 
right?

> 2. use MACRO to have shift to set to 5, but there is not
>    explanation about selection.
> 
> We can fix them with:
> 1. Add get_new_step_size(), and check overflow by comparing new_size
>    with old step_size.
> 2. add comment in it about why we are using 5.
> 
> That will make code more readable while not increasing size of
> init_mem_mapping().

Well, it gets not just more readable at a small size 
increase, but also the above unexplained overflow bug will 
be fixed as well, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/