Re: PATCH? fix unshare(NEWPID) && vfork()

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Tue Aug 20 2013 - 13:59:34 EST


On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/19, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > So do you think this change is fine or not (ignoring the fact it needs
>> > cleanups) ?
>>
>> I think that removing the CLONE_VM check is fine (although there are
>> some other ones that should probably be removed as well), but I'm not
>> sure if that check needs replacing with something else.
>
> OK, thanks... but I still can't understand.
>
> The patch I sent is equivalent to the new one below. I just tried to
> unify it with another check in do_fork().

I was confused.

Currently (with or without your patch), vfork() followed by
unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER) or unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) will unshare the VM.
This may be surprising, but at least it will work.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/