Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Synchronize sleep time stats with seqlock
From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Tue Aug 20 2013 - 11:33:57 EST
On 8/20/2013 8:29 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Of course, if we can get away with completely removing all of that
(which I think Arjan suggested was a real possibility) then that would
be ever so much better still :-)
Would be lovely. But I don't know much about cpufreq, I hope somebody who's
familiar with that code can handle this. Then once there are no more users
of get_cpu_iowait_sleep_time() I can simply zap and clean the tick/time related
code.
it's just doing the "idle = 100 - busy% - iowait%" calculation.
(with the later part only for Intel cpus iirc)
in a perfect world the scheduler would be doing that calculation in the first place ;-)
removing the later part will impact performance some on specific workloads,
but most Intel cpus that this applies to should not be using cpufreq anymore
anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/