Re: [PATCH 1/7] PCI: tegra: replace devm_request_and_ioremap bydevm_ioremap_resource

From: Thierry Reding
Date: Mon Aug 19 2013 - 15:33:50 EST


On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:07:54PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:20:35PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Use devm_ioremap_resource instead of devm_request_and_ioremap.
> > > > >
> > > > > This was done using the semantic patch
> > > > > scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_ioremap_resource.cocci
> > > > >
> > > > > Error-handling code was manually removed from the associated calls to
> > > > > platform_get_resource.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > The first block of modified code is followed by a call to
> > > > > devm_request_mem_region for pcie->cs with no associated ioremap. Should
> > > > > ioremap be used in this case as well?
> > > >
> > > > No. The pcie->cs resource is 256 MiB so it's challenging to map it at
> > > > once. Furthermore it requires a non-linear mapping so we do it on
> > > > demand.
> > >
> > > OK, thanks for the explanation. Is the comment, though, a little
> > > misleading, since the mapping is not done here?
> > >
> > > /* request and remap configuration space */
> >
> > Yes, that's misleading. Given that it doesn't really add anything useful
> > information either, perhaps I should just remove it.
>
> OK, or maybe something like
>
> /* request configuration space, but remap later, on demand */
>
> To make it clear that something different is intended than the
> devm_ioremap_resources that come just before..

Yes, that works for me too. Can you respin the patch with the comment
updated and my Acked-by and Tested-by so Bjorn can pick it up?

Thierry

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature