Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On 08/16/2013 12:01 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 09:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
> > Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > > Dear RT folks!
> > > >
> > > > I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
> > >
> > > I'm getting this when trying to build:
> > >
> > > drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cached_dev_write_complete':
> > > drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1008:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > > function 'up_read_non_owner' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >     up_read_non_owner(&dc->writeback_lock);
> > >     ^
> > > drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'request_write':
> > > drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1034:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > > function 'down_read_non_owner' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >     down_read_non_owner(&dc->writeback_lock);
> > >     ^
> > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > Can you send us your config.
>
> The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
> just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
> definition says that it is wrong to use them and completion is the
> right way to do it.
> So my question is, why don't we use completion but this nasty hack?

In the meanwhile, any hope of a patch to be able to compile and test 
with my current configuration?
Thanks,
-- Fernando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/