Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree

[Terry Suereth]

Per my original patch, "0x3x26" in code should be "0x3726" (as in the
unpatched version).  I refer to "x26" in comments as a forward-looking
assumption, but AFAIK only 3726 and 3826 exist at this time.

terry.suereth@xxxxxxxxx


On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c: In function 'sata_pmp_quirks':
> drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c:386:36: error: invalid suffix "x26" on integer constant
>   if (vendor == 0x1095 && (devid == 0x3x26 || devid == 0x3826)) {
>                                     ^
>
> Caused by commit f1a313ad86b9 ("libata: apply behavioral quirks to sil3826 PMP").
>
> I have used the libata tree from next-20130816 for today.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/