[PATCH 108/133] drm: Don't pass negative delta to ktime_sub_ns()

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.8.13.7 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: =?UTF-8?q?Michel=20D=C3=A4nzer?= <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>

commit e91abf80a0998f326107874c88d549f94839f13c upstream.

It takes an unsigned value. This happens not to blow up on 64-bit
architectures, but it does on 32-bit, causing
drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos() to calculate totally bogus
timestamps for vblank events. Which in turn causes e.g. gnome-shell to
hang after a DPMS off cycle with current xf86-video-ati Git.

[airlied: regression introduced in drm: use monotonic time in drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos]

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
Tested-by: shui yangwei <yangweix.shui@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michel DÃnzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index 570dac6..0f3cdda 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -704,7 +704,10 @@ int drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc,
 	/* Subtract time delta from raw timestamp to get final
 	 * vblank_time timestamp for end of vblank.
 	 */
-	etime = ktime_sub_ns(etime, delta_ns);
+	if (delta_ns < 0)
+		etime = ktime_add_ns(etime, -delta_ns);
+	else
+		etime = ktime_sub_ns(etime, delta_ns);
 	*vblank_time = ktime_to_timeval(etime);
 
 	DRM_DEBUG("crtc %d : v %d p(%d,%d)@ %ld.%ld -> %ld.%ld [e %d us, %d rep]\n",
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/