RE: [PATCH v8 0/2] TWL6030, TWL6032 GPADC driver

[Kozaruk, Oleksandr]

>On 08/15/13 13:59, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The changes to the original driver:
>>>>> - device tree adaptation;
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't see a binding document in this series or in mainline. Have I
>>>> looked in the wrong places?
>>>
>>> Nothing explicit supplied, but does it need one given it is doing only
>>> iio bindings (bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt)
>>> plus twl child bindings
>>> (bindings/mfd/twl-family.txt)
>>
>> Every binding needs to be documented.
>>
>>>
>>> If it does, I guess absolutely everything does, then fair enough!
>>> I guess that would make sense as there is no way for someone writing
>>> a device tree to know that there is nothing else to be specified.
>>
>> Yup, that's why. Also, Linux isn't necessarily the only consumer, and
>> other consumers shouldn't need to read Linux code to figure out how a
>> particular binding is supposed to look.
>>
>Fair enough. Thanks for clearing that up.
>
>Oleksandr, could you send a follow up patch adding the required documentation?
>(mostly a cut and paste job from similar elements by the look of it).
>

Hello,

Is this good enough?