Re: [PATCH 17/18] cpufreq: powerpc: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Fri Jun 07 2013 - 01:18:31 EST


On 31 May 2013 16:20, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20 May 2013 10:10, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 13 May 2013 11:34, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 22 April 2013 12:19, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Compile Tested only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 31 ----------------------
>>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/Makefile | 1 -
>>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile | 2 --
>>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.powerpc | 26 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 3 +++
>>>>>>> .../cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 0
>>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 0
>>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 0
>>>>>>> 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c (100%)
>>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c (100%)
>>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c (100%)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Deepthi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you help testing this please?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ping!!
>>>>
>>>> Ping!!
>>>
>>> Hi Benjamin,
>>>
>>> Hope you are back from your vacations. Can you give it a try now?
>>
>> Ping!!
>
> Ping!!

Hi Rafael,

Its been more than 2 months now that this patch was first posted.
And the response from Maintainers isn't so great, irrespective of
how many times I pinged them.

This is what I think:
- It looked functionally correct to Benjamin but he wanted somebody
to actually test it.
- Arnd gave his Ack (So it looked functionally correct to him too)
- We can probably push this into linux-next now and see if somebody
complains of any breakage it has done. If not we can get it pushed for
3.11.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/