Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: prevent 'policy->cpus' become offline in __gov_queue_work()

From: Michael Wang
Date: Wed Jun 05 2013 - 04:59:10 EST


Hi, Viresh

On 06/05/2013 04:53 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
[snip]
>> It was caused by the policy->cpus changed during the process of
>> __gov_queue_work(), in other word, cpu offline happened.
>>
>> This patch will use get/put_online_cpus() to prevent the offline
>> happen inside __gov_queue_work(), after applied the patch, the
>> warning is gone as Jiri tested:
>>
>> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/5/88
>>
>> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>> CC: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 3 +++
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your ack :)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/