Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del

From: JÃrn Engel
Date: Tue Jun 04 2013 - 23:38:58 EST


On Tue, 4 June 2013 14:44:35 -0400, JÃrn Engel wrote:
>
> Or while_list_drain?

Not sure if the silence is approval or lack of interest, but a new set
of patches is posted. By playing around with the implementation a
bit, I have actually found a variant that makes the object code
shrink. Not one variant gave same-size object code. There's compiler
optimization for you.

JÃrn

--
Money can buy bandwidth, but latency is forever.
-- John R. Mashey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/