Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] net: phy: prevent linking breakage

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Jun 04 2013 - 11:08:01 EST


On Thursday 30 May 2013 02:42:01 David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > On 28/05/2013 22:09, David Miller wrote:
> > But that is making it impossible to compile a kernel without any network
> > stack for those platforms or we are going back to either enclosing the
> > calls to phy_register_fixup{,_for_uid,_for_id} with #ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB
> > or if(IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_PHYLIB)). And as you can see, it is quite error
> > prone and is done only done for 2 platforms on a total of 6. I believe
> > fixing that in phy.h is more foolproof.
>
> Or you properly segregate the networking bits of the platform code so
> that it can be built only when the necessary networking portions are
> enabled.
>
> Sometimes having dummy stubs makes sense, but not in this situation.

Currently most users of this function are doing something like

static int foo_phy_fixup(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
...
}

static int __init boo_board_init(void)
{
if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_PHYLIB))
phy_register_fixup_for_uid(phy_id, foo_phy_fixup);
}

which is practically the same as having a dummy stub. It leads to
the foo_phy_fixup() function always getting compiled and then discarded
by gcc when CONFIG_PHYLIB is disabled.

The method is currently broken when network drivers are enabled as
modules, because we are missing the fixup then.

I think we should use IS_ENABLED() here to force a build error
in that case, and have something like

config ARCH_FOO
bool "support for the foo platform"
select PHYLIB if NET

in the platform Kconfig file, to ensure PHYLIB is always built-in.

I still think the inline alternatives would be helpful, but using
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYLIB)) in the platform code would also
work.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/