Re: [PATCH] ARM: avoid mis-detecting some V7 cores in thedecompressor

From: Nicolas Pitre
Date: Tue Jun 04 2013 - 01:28:09 EST


On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 06/03/13 15:45, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:37:39PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> In my case I'm booting a kernel with textoffset = 0x208000 but RAM
> >> starts at 0x0. Does "minimum of RAM start" mean 0x0 or 0x200000?
> > The basic requirement for zImage's is no less than the start of RAM
> > plus 32K. Or let me put it another way - start of writable memory
> > plus 32K.
> >
> > Whether you need an offset of 0x200000 or not is not for the
> > decompressor to know. If you're having to avoid the first 0x200000
> > bytes of memory for some reason (eg, secure firmware or DSP needs
> > it left free) then there's no way for the decompressor to know that,
> > so it's irrelevant.
> >
> > So, lets say that your platform has a DSP which needs the first 0x200000
> > bytes left free. So the boot loader _already_ needs to know to load
> > the image not at zero, but above 0x200000. The additional 32K
> > requirement is really nothing new and so should be treated in just the
> > same way.
> >
> > Leave at least 32K of usable memory below the zImage at all times.
>
> Understood. On my device writeable RAM actually starts at 0x0 but I have
> compiled in support for devices which don't have writeable memory at
> 0x0, instead they have writeable memory starting at 0x200000. Because I
> have a kernel supporting more than one device with differing memory
> layouts I run into this problem. The same problem will occur to any
> devices in the multi-platform kernel when a device with unwriteable
> memory near the bottom (such as MSM8960) joins the multi-platform defconfig.
>
> Let me try to word it in your example. I have compiled in support for a
> platform that has a DSP which needs the first 0x200000 bytes left free.
> I have also compiled in support for a platform that doesn't have this
> requirement. I plan to run the zImage on the second platform (the one
> without the DSP requirement). The bootloader I'm running this zImage on
> has no idea that I've compiled in support for the other platform with
> the DSP requirement so it assumes it can load the zImage at the start of
> RAM (0x0) plus 32K. This is bad because then the page tables get written
> into my compressed data and it fails to decompress.

I've looked at the code and I think that #1 in your initial options is
probably best here. I agree with Russell about #2 being way too complex
for only this case.

So, right before calling into cache_on, you could test if r4 - 16K >= pc
and r4 < pc + (_end - .) then skip cache_on.

Something like this untested patch:

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
index 9a94f344df..9e0dbbccdd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
@@ -182,7 +182,16 @@ not_angel:
ldr r4, =zreladdr
#endif

- bl cache_on
+ /* Set up a page table only if we don't overwrite ourself */
+ ldr r0, 1f
+ add r0, r0, pc
+ cmp r4, r0
+ mov r0, pc
+ cmpcc r0, r4
+ blcs cache_on
+ b restart
+ .align 2
+1: .word _end - . + 0x4000

restart: adr r0, LC0
ldmia r0, {r1, r2, r3, r6, r10, r11, r12}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/