Re: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390

[Michael Holzheu]

On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:59:40 -0400
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:27:18PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> 
> [..]
> > > If not, how would remap_pfn_range() work with HSA region when
> > > /proc/vmcore is mmaped()?
> > 
> > I am no memory management expert, so I discussed that with Martin
> > Schwidefsky (s390 architecture maintainer). Perhaps something like
> > the following could work:
> > 
> > After vmcore_mmap() is called the HSA pages are not initially
> > mapped in the page tables. So when user space accesses those parts
> > of /proc/vmcore, a fault will be generated. We implement a mechanism
> > that in this case the HSA is copied to a new page in the page cache
> > and a mapping is created for it. Since the page is allocated in the
> > page cache, it can be released afterwards by the kernel when we get
> > memory pressure.
> > 
> > Our current idea for such an implementation:
> > 
> > * Create new address space (struct address_space) for /proc/vmcore.
> > * Implement new vm_operations_struct "vmcore_mmap_ops" with
> >   new vmcore_fault() ".fault" callback for /proc/vmcore.
> > * Set vma->vm_ops to vmcore_mmap_ops in mmap_vmcore().
> > * The vmcore_fault() function will get a new page cache page,
> >   copy HSA page to page cache page add it to vmcore address space.
> >   To see how this could work, we looked into the functions
> >   filemap_fault() in "mm/filemap.c" and relay_buf_fault() in
> >   "kernel/relay.c".
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> I am not mm expert either but above proposal sounds reasonable to me.
> 
> So remap_pfn_range() call will go in arch dependent code so that arch
> can decide which range can be mapped right away and which ranges will
> be filed in when fault happens? I am assuming that s390 will map
> everything except for pfn between 0 and HSA_SIZE.

Yes, for [0 - HSA_SIZE] the fault handler will be called and for
the rest we establish a mapping with remap_pfn_range() as it is
currently done. Therefore no fault handler will be called for that part
of /proc/vmcore.

I will try to find out if it is doable that way.

> And regular s390 kdump will map everyting right away and will not
> have to rely on fault mechanism?

Yes, as kdump on the other archs.

Thanks
Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/