Re: [PATCH 16/16] perf, persistent: Allow multiple users for an event

[Jiri Olsa]

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:47:36AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxxxxxx>

SNIP

>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&per_cpu(pers_events_lock, cpu));
>  }
> @@ -182,18 +195,31 @@ fail:
>  int perf_get_persistent_event_fd(unsigned cpu, struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>  {
>  	struct pers_event_desc *desc;
> +	struct perf_event *event;
>  	int event_fd = -ENODEV;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&per_cpu(pers_events_lock, cpu));

maybe check for valid cpu, since perf_get_persistent_event_fd is
called directly from syscall allowing anything in cpu

(unrelated to this patch, but I couldn't find the original
patch that adds perf_get_persistent_event_fd)

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/