Re: [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous

From: Josh Wu
Date: Mon Jun 03 2013 - 01:49:42 EST


On 5/31/2013 10:34 PM, Richard Genoud wrote:
We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correting
capability is chosen.

Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@xxxxxxxxx>

Best Regards,
Josh Wu

---
drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 2d23d29..2415cdc 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
return err_no;
}
- if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
+ if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/