Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] rtc-at91rm9200: add shadow interrupt mask

From: Nicolas Ferre
Date: Thu May 30 2013 - 03:50:44 EST


On 29/05/2013 22:41, Robert Nelson :
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:38:50 +0200 Johan Hovold <jhovold@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is an update of the shadow-interrupt-mask series against v3.10-rc2.

I guess we need Atmel to confirm that all sam9x5 SoCs are indeed
affected. If not, then some probing mechanism as the one Doug suggested
could be implemented on top of (a subset of) these patches. What do you
say, Nicolas?

Note that the first patch (adding a missing OF compile guard) could be
applied straight away.

At this stage it is unclear to me how to proceed with patches 2-5.

fyi:

A version of these patches had been applied once before:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0ef1594c017521ea89278e80fe3f80dafb17abde

But due to a few issues it was later reverted:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e24b0bfa2f0446ffaad2661040be23668133aef8

This new revision doesn't have the issue encountered by first version.

Andrew,

The review of this patch series was in my TODO list for some time...

Today, I magically took time to review it ;-)
The patch series is good and I (even if it is too late) here is my:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>

I do not know if the series can be stacked for inclusion in 3.10-rc but the resolution of this bug can help a lot (as Douglas is saying in subsequent email...).

Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/