Re: [PATCH 1/1] ktime: Use macro NSEC_PER_USEC instead of a magicnumber
From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Tue May 07 2013 - 05:12:44 EST
On 05/07/2013 11:08 AM, Liu Ying wrote:
2013/5/7 Liu Ying <liu.y.victor@xxxxxxxxx>
2013/5/7 Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 05/06/2013 02:42 PM, y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
If you only have 1 patch, then you don't need "1/1" in the subject.
The term magic number here might be a little exaggerated, not so
magic actually. :-)
Thanks. I will update this. How about turning "magic number" to "immediate
number"?
Maybe like ``ktime: Use macro NSEC_PER_USEC where appropriate''.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/