[PATCH] ACPI / SPI: Use parent's ACPI_HANDLE() in acpi_register_spi_devices()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Mar 31 2013 - 20:13:42 EST


From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

The ACPI handle of struct spi_master's dev member should not be
set, because this causes that struct spi_master to be associated
with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the
second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during
the registration of struct spi_master). Consequently,
acpi_register_spi_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the
parent of the struct spi_master it is called for rather than that
struct spi_master's ACPI handle (which should be NULL).

Make that happen and modify the spi-pxa2xx driver, which currently is
the only driver for ACPI-enumerated SPI controller chips, not to set
the ACPI handle for the struct spi_master it creates.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c | 1 -
drivers/spi/spi.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static void acpi_register_spi_devices(st
acpi_status status;
acpi_handle handle;

- handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&master->dev);
+ handle = ACPI_HANDLE(master->dev.parent);
if (!handle)
return;

Index: linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
@@ -1168,7 +1168,6 @@ static int pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct platf

master->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
- ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&master->dev, ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev));
/* the spi->mode bits understood by this driver: */
master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH | SPI_LOOP;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/