Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Implement per policy instance of governor

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Sat Mar 30 2013 - 21:30:29 EST


On 31 March 2013 03:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, I'll remove it.

Thanks.

> And by the way, I'm no longer amused with the mess going on in the cpufreq land.
>
> Please send me *patches*. I'm not interested in git pointers.

Hmm.

> Moreover, please send those patches in a way allowing me to figure out the
> ordering without looking into your git tree.

Yes, i was planning to do so.

> If you have a number of outstanding cpufreq patches for me to apply, please
> create a patch series out of them and send it.

Do you mean, i should merge all stuff i have queued up for 3.10 in a
single patchset?
Like for-3.10? Will do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/