Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 16:58 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> There is not enough reason to place this checking at
> update_sg_lb_stats(),
> except saving one iteration for sched_group_cpus. But with this
> change,
> we can save two memset cost and can expect better compiler
> optimization,
> so clean-up may be more beneficial to us.

It would be good if you'd described what you actually did, there's a
lot of code movement and now I have to figure out wth you did and why.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/