Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:asm/8267

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:07:27PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:04:55AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:34:27PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > Interesting read, thanks guys. I think I should have a look into the
> > > > tree-preempt implementation and try to understand it :)
> > > 
> > > Hurry, before paulmck comes and changes it unrecognizable! :-)
> > 
> > Better yet, review my changes for 3.10.  ;-)
> 
> Oh, and if one needs to brush up on RCU while doing that, there's this
> cool thing called perfbook (whole title is too long :)) I discovered
> while searching for your 3.10 queue on k.org. :-)

Reviews of perfbook are also welcome.  ;-)

In case you didn't find it, the 3.10 queue is at rcu/next in:

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git

The corresponding LKML posts may be found at:

	https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/18/960
	https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/18/570
	https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/18/594

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/