Re: [PATCH 0/8] Move ntp state to be protected by timekeeping lock

[Richard Cochran]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 01:08:10PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:

> This patchset makes the lock ownership lines less obvious, but I've
> been sure to keep the ntp state static to ntp.c and instead provided
> some accessors via ntp-internal.h that timekeping code can use to
> make changes.  The only really ugly part is that do_adjtimex() has
> to split some of the logic between timekeeping.c and ntp.c in order
> to really get the locking done correctly.

I didn't find this too ugly or troublesome. The reshuffling you have
here looks straightforward to me.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/