[PATCH 09/86] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix_route

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue Mar 26 2013 - 14:05:23 EST


3.6.11.1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 85da53bf1c336bb07ac038fb951403ab0478d2c5 ]

The tests on the flags in addrconf_get_prefix_route() does no make
much sense: the 'noflags' parameter contains the set of flags that
must not match with the route flags, so the test must be done
against 'noflags', and not against 'flags'.

Signed-off-by: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index b10374d..fd82a30 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1736,7 +1736,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *addrconf_get_prefix_route(const struct in6_addr *pfx,
continue;
if ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != flags)
continue;
- if ((noflags != 0) && ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != 0))
+ if ((rt->rt6i_flags & noflags) != 0)
continue;
dst_hold(&rt->dst);
break;
--
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/