Re: [PATCH] drivers: acpi: Used PTR_RET function

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:32:51 AM Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote:
> Used PTR_RET function instead of explicit checking with IS_ERR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next.

Thanks,
Rafael


> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> index 31de104..27bb6a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int create_power_saving_task(void)
>  	ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num] = kthread_run(power_saving_thread,
>  		(void *)(unsigned long)ps_tsk_num,
>  		"acpi_pad/%d", ps_tsk_num);
> -	rc = IS_ERR(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]) ? PTR_ERR(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]) : 0;
> +	rc = PTR_RET(ps_tsks[ps_tsk_num]);
>  	if (!rc)
>  		ps_tsk_num++;
>  	else
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/