Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT] regulator: ab8500: Remove is_enabled from struct ab8500_regulator_info

[Axel Lin]

2013/3/26 Bengt Jönsson <bengt.g.jonsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 03/26/2013 07:50 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
>>
>> The is_enabled flag looks not necessary at all, it also introduces some
>> issues
>> because current code updates info->is_enabled flag in error paths of
>> ab8500_regulator_enable() and ab8500_regulator_disable().
>> Thus this patch removes is_enabled from struct ab8500_regulator_info.
>>
>> This patch also removes info->is_enabled checking in
>> ab8500_regulator_set_mode(),
>> so it allows setting mode even the regulator is disabled.
>
> This patch will change the behaviour of set_mode as the ab8500 regulators
> share mode and enable in the same register bits:
> - off = 0b00
> - low power mode= 0b11
> - full powermode = 0b01
> - (HW control mode = 0b10)
>
> To keep regulator_enable/disable apart from regulator_set_mode I think this
> patch should not go in.

Thanks for the review.
I'll send a patch to avoid update is_enabled flag in error paths.

Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/