Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: drivers: Remove unnecessary assignmentsof policy-> members

From: Sekhar Nori
Date: Tue Mar 26 2013 - 02:06:32 EST



On 3/25/2013 3:54 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25 March 2013 15:11, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> So down in the cpufreq driver probe below, we bail out if freq_table is
>> not provided. So all this checking for freq_table in the code you pasted
>> above is superfluous. If you can clean that part up and add checking for
>> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() as you proposed, I will be glad to
>> test it out ;)
>
> Attached is the complete patch and following is your fixup for davinci
> (just to review):

For the attached patch,

[nsekhar@xxxxxx: tested on da850 evm]
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx>

Thanks,
sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/