Re: [RFC 1/1] clk: Add notifier support inclk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:22:47PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Is clk_set_rate() only legal to call in non-atomic contexts then? The
> header file doesn't say, although I guess since many other functions
> explicitly say they can't, then by omission it can...

I think when all this was discussed alongside the clk_prepare/clk_unprepare
stuff, that yes, it was decided that clk_set_rate() was non-atomic only.

And yes, that is most definitely the case, because the first thing 
clk_set_rate() does is take a mutex - which will trigger a might_sleep()
complaint if ever called from an atomic context.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/