Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Add device-tree binding supportfor da850 SOC

From: Sekhar Nori
Date: Thu Mar 14 2013 - 07:43:34 EST


On 3/14/2013 4:02 PM, Philip Avinash wrote:
> ECAP IP is used in da850 SOC's also. Hence adds ECAP device tree binding
> support for da850.
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@xxxxxx>
> ---
> :100644 100644 131e8c1... fcbd3c1... M Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
> :100644 100644 22e96e2... e0d96c8... M drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
> index 131e8c1..fcbd3c1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> TI SOC ECAP based APWM controller
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: Must be "ti,am33xx-ecap"
> +- compatible: Must be "ti,am33xx-ecap" or "ti,da850-ecap"
> - #pwm-cells: Should be 3. Number of cells being used to specify PWM property.
> First cell specifies the per-chip index of the PWM to use, the second
> cell is the period in nanoseconds and bit 0 in the third cell is used to
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
> index 22e96e2..e0d96c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static const struct pwm_ops ecap_pwm_ops = {
>
> static const struct of_device_id ecap_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "ti,am33xx-ecap" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,da850-ecap" },
> {},

You add a new compatible, but don't really show any changes in driver in
this series. So why can't we simply use ti,am33xx-ecap on DA850 too?

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/