Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: bounds check execbuffer relocation count

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:07:46AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:31:45PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
> > relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.
> > 
> > CVE-2013-0913
> > 
> > v3: collapse test, improve comment
> > v2: move check into validate_exec_list
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Pinkie Pie
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Looks good to me. The only bikeshed that remains is whether we should
> just collapse the two variables into one, but the current 'max - count'
> is more idiomatic and so preferrable.
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/