Re: [PATCH 0/9] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion (v17)

From: Sedat Dilek
Date: Wed Mar 13 2013 - 15:10:34 EST


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2013-03-13 7:12 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:51:33PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Anyway, with CONFIG_OVERLAYFS_FS=m I do not see any related messages
>>> >> when the kernel-module is loaded.
>>> >> So, is this intended?
>>> >> SquashFS prints into the logs, so what is it doing differently?
>>> >
>>> > Some modules do, some don't. It's not compulsory and not very useful.
>>> >
>>>
>>> What about...
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
>>> index 482c26f..92b9ad5 100644
>>> --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
>>> @@ -675,11 +675,13 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_FS("overlayfs");
>>> static int __init ovl_init(void)
>>> {
>>> return register_filesystem(&ovl_fs_type);
>>> + printk(KERN_INFO "overlayfs: loaded\n");
>>
>> How about pr_debug(). That makes things quite for most of us but gives
>> you info when looking for things like boot problems.
> How is having a printk/pr_debug useful here at all? The fact that other
> filesystems do this as well is not a good reason...
> Also, putting it *after* the return statement doesn't make much sense ;)
>

Hehe, I just checked my new kernel... that does not work (nothing in the logs).
But I think it's good to see if the filesystem is registered/loaded.

- Sedat -

> - Felix
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/