Re: [PATCH 1/3] dw_mmc: Don't loop when handling an interrupt

[Chris Ball]

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 13 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> There is no reason to loop when handling an interrupt. The "if" clauses
>> will handle all of them sequentially. This also eliminates the extra loop
>> we used to take with no pending interrupts and we ended up breaking out
>> of the while loop.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You can add my ack to other patches.
> However, could you change the subject prefix to 'mmc: dw_mmc' and resend?

It's okay, I'll take care of that when applying this time.  Thanks!

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/