Re: pipe_release oops.

From: Dave Jones
Date: Mon Mar 11 2013 - 21:27:12 EST


On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:30:01AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, that does the trick.
> > I changed your other diff a little to use a goto, which reduces a level of indentation..
>
> Hmm. So I've been trying to figure this out, and I really don't see
> it. Every single pipe open routine *should* make sure that the inode
> has an inode->i_pipe field. So if the open() has succeeded and you
> have a valid file descriptor, the inode->i_pipe thing should be there.
>
> I must be missing something, and I wonder if the thing I'm missing is
> that with OPEN_PATH we may now have open calls that don't actually
> have FMODE_READ or FMODE_WRITE set at all.
>
> So suddenly we end up with these pipe openers that don't update the
> counts, and I could imagine that really confusing us...
>
> So I'm wondering if you could apply this patch, and see if that
> triggers. In fact, please un-apply the other changes to fs/pipe.c too,
> to see if it also obviates the need for checking i_pipe for NULL. You
> should get the new warning (once), but you should not get any oopses..
>
> Anyway, this would explain why the actual read/write paths don't need
> to check for i_pipe - if FMODE_READ/WRITE aren't set, we'll never get
> that far. But the release() and the fasync functions do get called
> even for non-readable and non-writable files...


finally managed to trigger this now that all the other stuff got fixed.

WARNING: at fs/pipe.c:867 pipe_rdwr_open+0xb8/0xd0()
Hardware name: GA-MA78GM-S2H
Pid: 23339, comm: trinity-child0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc2+ #91
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81045115>] warn_slowpath_common+0x75/0xa0
[<ffffffff8104515a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffff811c4208>] pipe_rdwr_open+0xb8/0xd0
[<ffffffff811b9c5b>] do_dentry_open+0x25b/0x300
[<ffffffff811c4150>] ? pipe_unlock+0x30/0x30
[<ffffffff811b9d49>] finish_open+0x49/0x60
[<ffffffff811cb119>] do_last+0x6d9/0xf10
[<ffffffff8107a722>] ? lg_local_unlock+0x42/0x70
[<ffffffff811de629>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x49/0x130
[<ffffffff811de736>] ? mntput+0x26/0x40
[<ffffffff811c5ca2>] ? path_put+0x22/0x30
[<ffffffff811cbc93>] path_openat+0x343/0x500
[<ffffffff811cc101>] do_filp_open+0x41/0xa0
[<ffffffff811bb0a4>] do_sys_open+0xf4/0x1e0
[<ffffffff811bb1d4>] sys_openat+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffff816d08c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---[ end trace 8290ea887bf97579 ]---

Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/