Re: mmap vs fs cache

From: Jan Kara
Date: Mon Mar 11 2013 - 07:52:29 EST


On Fri 08-03-13 20:22:19, Phillip Susi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/08/2013 10:00 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
> > Yes, that's what I was thinking. I added a
> > posix_madvise(..POSIX_MADV_RANDOM) but that had no effect on the
> > test.
>
> Yep, that's because it isn't implemented.
Why do you think so? AFAICS it is implemented by setting VM_RAND_READ
flag in the VMA and do_async_mmap_readahead() and do_sync_mmap_readahead()
check for the flag and don't do anything if it is set...

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/