Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8 March 2013 21:11, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:50 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play with.
>>> > The amount of patches could be reduced, but I would like to get a comments
>>> > first on smaller pieces. The entire series creates dmatest.txt file in the
>>> > Documentation folder. Similar description is scattered through the commit
>>> > messages.
>>> >
>>> > Module was tested on Intel Medfield and Lynxpoint systems with dw_dmac DMA
>>> > controller embedded.
>>> Overall the series looks good. I think it can applied in this form as well.
>>
>> Viresh, so, you are the only one who speaks about reducing amount of
>> patches. Do you think is better to either reduce, or leave as is? In
>> case of go with smaller amount, could you provide simple scheme which
>> patch should be merged with which?

> I have been damn busy with Linaro Connect last week and couldn't review all
> patches too. Probably you can just go ahead with this patchset only as Vinod
> is okay with it.

It seems Vinod is on vacation. So, take your time to finish review. I
appreciate it.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/