Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] cpufreq: exynos: Adding cpufreq driver for exynos5440

From: amit kachhap
Date: Sun Mar 10 2013 - 23:45:55 EST


Hi Viresh,

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 12:13, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
>> +struct exynos_dvfs_data {
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + struct resource *mem;
>> + int irq;
>> + struct clk *cpu_clk;
>> + unsigned int cur_frequency;
>> + unsigned int latency;
>> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
>> + unsigned int freq_count;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + bool dvfs_enable;
>
> s/enable/enabled?
Ok
>
>> +static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>> + dvfs_info->cpu_clk = devm_clk_get(dvfs_info->dev, "armclk");
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dvfs_info->cpu_clk)) {
>
> s/IS_ERR_OR_NULL/IS_ERR
Ok.
>
>> + if (devm_request_irq(dvfs_info->dev, dvfs_info->irq, exynos_cpufreq_irq,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE, CPUFREQ_NAME, dvfs_info)) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to register IRQ\n");
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>
> use the value returned from this function rather than creating your
> own.. true for all
> other calls too, unless they return NULL on error.
>
Will integrate your suggestions in the next version.

Thanks,
Amit D
>> +}
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/