Re: [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual_register()

[Kay Sievers]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:57:02AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hey, guys.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > > Sorry for the delay, I'm at a conference all this week, and haven't had
>> > > much time to think about this.
>> > >
>> > > If Kay says this is ok for now, that's good enough for me.
>> >
>> > Yes, it looks fine to me. If we provide the unified handling of
>> > classes and buses some day, this can probably go away, but until that
>> > it looks fine and is straight forward to do it that way,
>>
>> How should this be routed?  I can take it but Kay needs it too so
>> workqueue tree probably isn't the best fit although I can set up a
>> separate branch if needed.
>
> What patch set does Kay need it for?  I have no objection for you to
> take it through the workqueue tree:

The dbus bus has the same issues and needs the devices put under
virtual/ and not the devices/ root.

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/