Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10-tmp] workqueue: implement workqueue withcustom worker attributes

[Tejun Heo]

Hey, Lai.

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > This patchset contains the following 31 patches.
> > 
> >  0001-workqueue-make-sanity-checks-less-punshing-using-WAR.patch
> 
> >  0002-workqueue-make-workqueue_lock-irq-safe.patch
> 
> workqueue_lock protects too many things. We can introduce different locks
> for different purpose later.

I don't know.  My general attitude toward locking is the simpler the
better.  None of the paths protected by workqueue_lock are hot.
There's no actual benefit in making them finer grained.

> >  0023-workqueue-implement-get-put_pwq.patch
> 
> I guess this patch and patch25 may have very deep issue VS RCU.

Hmmm... scary.  I suppose you're gonna elaborate on the review of the
actual patch?

> >  0024-workqueue-prepare-flush_workqueue-for-dynamic-creati.patch
> >  0025-workqueue-perform-non-reentrancy-test-when-queueing-.patch
> >  0026-workqueue-implement-apply_workqueue_attrs.patch
> >  0027-workqueue-make-it-clear-that-WQ_DRAINING-is-an-inter.patch
> >  0028-workqueue-reject-increasing-max_active-for-ordered-w.patch
> >  0029-cpumask-implement-cpumask_parse.patch
> >  0030-driver-base-implement-subsys_virtual_register.patch
> >  0031-workqueue-implement-sysfs-interface-for-workqueues.patch
> 
> 
> for 1~13,15~22,26~28, please add Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Done.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/