Re: [nsproxy] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereferenceat 0000000000000024

[Rakib Mullick]

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When a new task is created one of two things needs to happen.
> A) A reference count needs to be added to the current nsproxy.
> B) B a new nsproxy needs to be created.
>
> The way that code works today is far from a shiny example of totally
> clear code but it is not incorrect.
>
> By moving get_nsproxy down below the first return 0, you removed taking
> the reference count in the one case it is important.
>
> Arguably we should apply the patch below for clarity, and I just might
> queue it up for 3.10.
>
This one is much more cleaner. One thing regarding this patch, can we
check the namespace related flags at copy_namespace() call time at
copy_process(), also get_nsproxy()? I think this will reduce some
extra function call overhead and as you've mentioned get_nsproxy() is
needed at every process creation.

Thanks,
Rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/